↓ Skip to main content

Variants in the vitamin D pathway, serum levels of vitamin D, and estrogen receptor negative breast cancer among African-American women: a case-control study

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Variants in the vitamin D pathway, serum levels of vitamin D, and estrogen receptor negative breast cancer among African-American women: a case-control study
Published in
Breast Cancer Research, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/bcr3162
Pubmed ID
Authors

Song Yao, Gary Zirpoli, Dana H Bovbjerg, Lina Jandorf, Chi Chen Hong, Hua Zhao, Lara E Sucheston, Li Tang, Michelle Roberts, Gregory Ciupak, Warren Davis, Helena Hwang, Candace S Johnson, Donald L Trump, Susan E McCann, Foluso Ademuyiwa, Karen S Pawlish, Elisa V Bandera, Christine B Ambrosone

Abstract

American women of African ancestry (AA) are more likely than European Americans (EA) to have estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer. 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) is low in AAs, and was associated with ER-negative tumors in EAs. We hypothesized that racial differences in 25OHD levels, as well as in inherited genetic variations, may contribute, in part, to the differences in tumor characteristics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 1%
Unknown 72 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Researcher 6 8%
Other 6 8%
Other 20 27%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 10 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2013.
All research outputs
#6,876,021
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#787
of 2,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,662
of 173,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#12
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.