| Title |
Innovating public engagement and patient involvement through strategic collaboration and practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Involvement and Engagement, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40900-019-0160-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leah Holmes, Katharine Cresswell, Susannah Williams, Suzanne Parsons, Annie Keane, Cassie Wilson, Safina Islam, Olivia Joseph, Jahanara Miah, Emily Robinson, Bella Starling |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 41 | 63% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 66% |
| Scientists | 13 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 198 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 86 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 7% |
| Psychology | 13 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 46 | 23% |
| Unknown | 89 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2022.
All research outputs
#941,318
of 24,793,937 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#69
of 470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,971
of 363,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,793,937 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.