| Title |
What’s for lunch? The content and quality of lunches consumed by Dutch primary schoolchildren and the differences between lunches consumed at home and at school
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-7750-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Frédérique C. Rongen, Ellen van Kleef, Sienna Sanjaya, Monique H. Vingerhoeds, Elly J. M. Buurma-Rethans, Coline van den Bogaard, Caroline T. M. van Rossum, Jacob C. Seidell, S. Coosje Dijkstra |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 13 | 52% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Burundi | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 60% |
| Scientists | 7 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 32 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 34 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,252,125
of 24,761,242 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,389
of 16,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,617
of 367,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#31
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,761,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.