↓ Skip to main content

How helpful are Patient and Public Involvement strategic documents - Results of a framework analysis using 4Pi National Involvement Standards

Overview of attention for article published in Research Involvement and Engagement, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 165)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
81 tweeters
Title
How helpful are Patient and Public Involvement strategic documents - Results of a framework analysis using 4Pi National Involvement Standards
Published in
Research Involvement and Engagement, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40900-019-0164-0
Authors

Rachel Matthews, Meerat Kaur, Catherine French, Alison Baker, Julie Reed

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#352,284
of 13,941,162 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#22
of 165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,724
of 252,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#7
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,941,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 165 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.