↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of Tripterygium wilfordii hook F for chronic urticaria: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
Title
Efficacy and safety of Tripterygium wilfordii hook F for chronic urticaria: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, August 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12906-018-2305-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liu, Huaibo Zhao, Xiaoying Sun, Qi Zheng, Ying Luo, Yi Ru, Ying Zhang, Xi Chen, Bo Zhu, Chengqian Yin, Bin Li, Xin Li

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2018.
All research outputs
#10,965,422
of 13,807,706 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
#1,909
of 2,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,486
of 200,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
#125
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,807,706 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,843 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.