↓ Skip to main content

Perceived fatigue in myotonic dystrophy type 1: a case-control study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neurology, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Perceived fatigue in myotonic dystrophy type 1: a case-control study
Published in
BMC Neurology, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12883-019-1280-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Winblad, Christopher Lindberg

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 18%
Psychology 1 9%
Neuroscience 1 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Unknown 6 55%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2019.
All research outputs
#10,982,343
of 13,839,074 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#1,255
of 1,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,527
of 202,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#112
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,839,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.