↓ Skip to main content

Gene expression profiling of flaxseed in mouse lung tissues-modulation of toxicologically relevant genes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Gene expression profiling of flaxseed in mouse lung tissues-modulation of toxicologically relevant genes
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-12-47
Pubmed ID
Authors

Floyd Dukes, Stathis Kanterakis, James Lee, Ralph Pietrofesa, Emily S Andersen, Evguenia Arguiri, Sonia Tyagi, Louise Showe, Yassine Amrani, Melpo Christofidou-Solomidou

Abstract

Flaxseed (FS), a nutritional supplement consisting mainly of omega-3 fatty acids and lignan phenolics has potent anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic and antioxidant properties. The usefulness of flaxseed as an alternative and complimentary treatment option has been known since ancient times. We have shown that dietary FS supplementation ameliorates oxidative stress and inflammation in experimental models of acute and chronic lung injury in mice resulting from diverse toxicants. The development of lung tissue damage in response to direct or indirect oxidant stress is a complex process, associated with changes in expression levels of a number of genes. We therefore postulated that flaxseed might modulate gene expression of vital signaling pathways, thus interfering with the development of tissue injury.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Materials Science 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2015.
All research outputs
#13,864,570
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,603
of 3,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,445
of 161,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#28
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.