RT @ManabuNakamura8: systematic reviewの報告の質ではなくて、方法論の評価をするツールもあるんですね。 使用目的をしっかり理解しとかなければ。 https://t.co/80XCnK4XtS
systematic reviewの報告の質ではなくて、方法論の評価をするツールもあるんですね。 使用目的をしっかり理解しとかなければ。 https://t.co/80XCnK4XtS
@lilacCourt @clarrysmith For a more formalised assessment of #systematicreviews it’s worth using the AMSTAR tool https://t.co/HhhjSrLfyI
RT @pmisson: "The authors should state that they searched for reports regardless of their publication type. The authors should state whethe…
"The authors should state that they searched for reports regardless of their publication type. The authors should state whether or not they excluded any reports (from the systematic review), based on their publication status, language etc." https://t.co/uZ
Comparing AMSTAR to PRISMA for assessing systematic review quality. Any thoughts? https://t.co/y4aBYzPKvP #bmcmedresmethodol
.@Mental_Elf I can't access the systematic review. What does it score on the AMSTAR rating (http://t.co/rbqkJWpfKE)?
Walden: project used AMSTAR http://t.co/phx3KHZDYk & AGREE http://t.co/g7tGzrqfWg as evaluation tools #mlanet13
quality assurance for systematic reviews http://t.co/gAd41baBmG something deep inside me wants to automate it to give instant feedback
Journal editors, reviewers unfamiliar with AMSTAR should not review meta-analyses. @PLOSMedicine @plosblogs take note. http://t.co/M78w5BSP
Journal editors, reviewers unfamiliar with AMSTAR should not review meta-analyses. @PLOSMedicine @plosblogs take note. http://t.co/M78w5BSP
I think very few meta analyses meet validated standards of AMSTAR http://t.co/M78w5BSP
#bmcmedicalresearchmethodology AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews http://t.co/nQBlKBL5