Interesting open access (OA) article says that "abstracts of articles on RCTs published in subscription medical journals had better reporting completeness according to CONSORT-A than abstracts published in OA journals." #medicalwriting https://t.co/oOxotx1
RT @EllaFlemyng: Using the @CONSORTing extension for Abstracts, Iva Jerčić Martinić-Cezar & @ana_marusic found that 79% of the 16 reporting…
RT @EllaFlemyng: Using the @CONSORTing extension for Abstracts, Iva Jerčić Martinić-Cezar & @ana_marusic found that 79% of the 16 reporting…
RT @RetractionWatch: "Abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in subscription medical journals have greater completeness of rep…
RT @RetractionWatch: "Abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in subscription medical journals have greater completeness of rep…
RT @RetractionWatch: "Abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in subscription medical journals have greater completeness of rep…
Interesting. Not sure I buy the argument that OA journals are adequately resourced for editorial work.
"Abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in subscription medical journals have greater completeness of reporting than abstracts published in OA journals." https://t.co/brb1lrl1Oj
RT @EllaFlemyng: Using the @CONSORTing extension for Abstracts, Iva Jerčić Martinić-Cezar & @ana_marusic found that 79% of the 16 reporting…
Using the @CONSORTing extension for Abstracts, Iva Jerčić Martinić-Cezar & @ana_marusic found that 79% of the 16 reporting items were completely reported in subscription journal articles compared with 65% in OA journals - via #Trialsjournal: https://t.
Completeness of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials in subscription and open access journals: cross-sectional study | Trials | Full Text https://t.co/KgiUq3rusq
Study: #openaccess journals publishing health research should take appropriate measures to ensure that published articles contain adequate detail to facilitate understanding and quality appraisal of research reports about RCTs https://t.co/nWrbswScf5
RT @SPARC_EU: New study: Completeness of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials in subscription and open access journals: c…
RT @TranspariMED: Oooops: "Abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in subscription medical journals have greater completeness…
RT @TranspariMED: Oooops: "Abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in subscription medical journals have greater completeness…
Oooops: "Abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in subscription medical journals have greater completeness of reporting than abstracts published in OA journals." https://t.co/hJ2DVe3tBT #openaccess #openscience @Strech_Da @PeterRolandG
New study: Completeness of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials in subscription and open access journals: cross-sectional study. https://t.co/ngb85Hl6He
RT @RickyPo: Completeness of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials in subscription and open access journals: cross-section…
Completeness of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials in subscription and open access journals: cross-sectional study https://t.co/qgGgF7Zgk1
RT @OpenScienceR: Completeness of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials in subscription and open access journals: cross-se…
Completeness of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials in subscription and open access journals: cross-sectional study https://t.co/wkoCua131F https://t.co/Z8SWPNUffy
RT @oatp: Completeness of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials in subscription and open access journals: cross-sectional…
Completeness of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials in subscription and open access journals: cross-sectional study. - PubMed ABSTRACT https://t.co/RSrP9Mb1pr
Completeness of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials in subscription and open access journals: cross-sectional study https://t.co/k4cDZAquU7