↓ Skip to main content

Collaborative learning about e-health for mental health professionals and service users in a structured anonymous online short course: pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
Title
Collaborative learning about e-health for mental health professionals and service users in a structured anonymous online short course: pilot study
Published in
BMC Medical Education, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-12-37
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily J Ashurst, Ray B Jones, Graham R Williamson, Tobit Emmens, Jon Perry

Abstract

Professionals are interested in using e-health but implementation of new methods is slow. Barriers to implementation include the need for training and limited awareness or experience. Research may not always convince mental health professionals (MHPs). Adding the 'voice' of mental health service users (MHSUs) in collaborative learning may help. Involving MHSUs in face-face education can be difficult. We had previously been unable to engage MHPs in online discussion with MHSUs. Here we assessed the feasibility of short online courses involving MHSUs and MHPs.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 96 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 22%
Student > Master 21 21%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 19%
Social Sciences 16 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 14%
Computer Science 6 6%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 12 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2013.
All research outputs
#6,294,482
of 12,409,138 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#745
of 1,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,189
of 119,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,409,138 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.