↓ Skip to main content

Collaborative learning about e-health for mental health professionals and service users in a structured anonymous online short course: pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
Title
Collaborative learning about e-health for mental health professionals and service users in a structured anonymous online short course: pilot study
Published in
BMC Medical Education, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-12-37
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily J Ashurst, Ray B Jones, Graham R Williamson, Tobit Emmens, Jon Perry

Abstract

Professionals are interested in using e-health but implementation of new methods is slow. Barriers to implementation include the need for training and limited awareness or experience. Research may not always convince mental health professionals (MHPs). Adding the 'voice' of mental health service users (MHSUs) in collaborative learning may help. Involving MHSUs in face-face education can be difficult. We had previously been unable to engage MHPs in online discussion with MHSUs. Here we assessed the feasibility of short online courses involving MHSUs and MHPs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 181 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 14%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 36 20%
Unknown 40 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 32 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 14%
Social Sciences 25 14%
Computer Science 6 3%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 43 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2012.
All research outputs
#16,026,612
of 25,346,731 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,265
of 3,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,124
of 171,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#14
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,346,731 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.