↓ Skip to main content

Structural factors and best practices in implementing a linkage to HIV care program using the ARTAS model

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Structural factors and best practices in implementing a linkage to HIV care program using the ARTAS model
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, August 2010
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-10-246
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason Craw, Lytt Gardner, Amber Rossman, DeAnn Gruber, O'Donnell Noreen, Diana Jordan, Richard Rapp, Cathy Simpson, Karen Phillips

Abstract

Implementation of linkage to HIV care programs in the U.S. is poorly described in the literature despite the central role of these programs in delivering clients from HIV testing facilities to clinical care sites. Models demonstrating success in linking clients to HIV care from testing locations that do not have co-located medical care are especially needed.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
South Africa 1 2%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 2%
Kenya 1 2%
Unknown 45 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 24%
Researcher 11 22%
Student > Master 10 20%
Unspecified 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Other 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 34%
Social Sciences 13 26%
Unspecified 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Other 8 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2012.
All research outputs
#3,238,965
of 12,372,945 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,552
of 4,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,508
of 119,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#14
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,372,945 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.