@James_M_Thomas I'm a noob in this area, so the whole field is interesting in terms of how science/evidence is built-up (implications for IL etc) and partly also after reading https://t.co/HeMz4oVVWS . I always thought Systematic review/meta-analysis = evi
And we updated the paper in 2019: https://t.co/zFjnNpOO9J
@carlton_fong Qualitative / quantitative can be unhelpful terms - https://t.co/kc1YPwdk42 Maybe more informative to describe your review in terms of the question(s) you are addressing with each synthesis?
RT @profsandyoliver: @paul_msg There's a thriving literature in the health and social sciences. https://t.co/Cwt6k1jRV9
@paul_msg There's a thriving literature in the health and social sciences. https://t.co/Cwt6k1jRV9
RT @ProfDavidGough: There is considerable variation between 'types' of review. We prefer to clarify the question that you want to address a…
RT @ProfDavidGough: There is considerable variation between 'types' of review. We prefer to clarify the question that you want to address a…
There is considerable variation between 'types' of review. We prefer to clarify the question that you want to address and then the many choices (dimensions of difference) open to you in undertaking the review: https://t.co/r6jtDc8Pg3 https://t.co/ncLxlrmf
RT @LSHTMEvaluation: Use qualitative evidence to: 1 extend effectiveness reviews; 2 stand alone to explore questions around perceptions. He…
RT @LSHTMEvaluation: Use qualitative evidence to: 1 extend effectiveness reviews; 2 stand alone to explore questions around perceptions. He…
RT @LSHTMEvaluation: Use qualitative evidence to: 1 extend effectiveness reviews; 2 stand alone to explore questions around perceptions. He…
RT @LSHTMEvaluation: Use qualitative evidence to: 1 extend effectiveness reviews; 2 stand alone to explore questions around perceptions. He…
Use qualitative evidence to: 1 extend effectiveness reviews; 2 stand alone to explore questions around perceptions. Helpful reference: https://t.co/rEjOov5U98 #HSR2018 https://t.co/i06FTHE5ak
RT @ProfDavidGough: I agree. Review methods labels very crude. Reviews should report all 'dimensions of difference' (including breadth of q…
RT @ProfDavidGough: I agree. Review methods labels very crude. Reviews should report all 'dimensions of difference' (including breadth of q…
I agree. Review methods labels very crude. Reviews should report all 'dimensions of difference' (including breadth of question, & depth & detail of method and process that may be narrower, shallower & less detailed in reviews called 'rapid') h
RT @paulsutcliffewe: Still an informative paper for clarifying differences between #review designs & #methods by @ProfDavidGough et al http…
Clarifying differences between review designs and methods https://t.co/oHf69BavqG #sysrevsj
RT @paulsutcliffewe: Still an informative paper for clarifying differences between #review designs & #methods by @ProfDavidGough et al http…
RT @ProfDavidGough: Thanks for the kind words Paul! We are in the process of updating the paper - it should be in Systematic Reviews J by t…
Thanks for the kind words Paul! We are in the process of updating the paper - it should be in Systematic Reviews J by the end of the year. https://t.co/lwarr6gLc0
RT @paulsutcliffewe: Still an informative paper for clarifying differences between #review designs & #methods by @ProfDavidGough et al http…
Still an informative paper for clarifying differences between #review designs & #methods by @ProfDavidGough et al https://t.co/5VNCirrNSl
RT @ProfDavidGough: Many thanks 4 the kind words!The paper grew out of our 'Intro to syst rev' book. A 2nd edition of the book is in press…
Many thanks 4 the kind words!The paper grew out of our 'Intro to syst rev' book. A 2nd edition of the book is in press (&revised paper soon) https://t.co/uHuXtyTn4T
RT @nealhaddaway: It's an oldie (ish) but a goodie! Love this paper for explaining different #systematicreview methods really clearly! http…
It's an oldie (ish) but a goodie! Love this paper for explaining different #systematicreview methods really clearly! https://t.co/pjSzJo9NU0
RT @MedicalEvidence: Clarifying differences between review designs and methods - @ProfDavidGough & co via #SysRevsJ: https://t.co/UVdMkbNcdf
Clarifying differences between review designs and methods - @ProfDavidGough & co via #SysRevsJ: https://t.co/UVdMkbNcdf
RT @OxEBHC_SR: A must read-Clarifying differences between review designs and methods https://t.co/zP6SHk6HBE #systematicreviews https://t.c…
RT @OxEBHC_SR: A must read-Clarifying differences between review designs and methods https://t.co/zP6SHk6HBE #systematicreviews https://t.c…
RT @OxEBHC_SR: A must read-Clarifying differences between review designs and methods https://t.co/zP6SHk6HBE #systematicreviews https://t.c…
A must read-Clarifying differences between review designs and methods https://t.co/zP6SHk6HBE #systematicreviews https://t.co/SpDFB9qaAE
Clarifying differences between review designs and methods https://t.co/avFqU0rmgn #mlanet16
RT @MedicalEvidence: Clarifying differences between review designs & methods - great #SysRevs Commentary by Gough, Thomas & Oliver: https:/…
RT @MedicalEvidence: Clarifying differences between review designs & methods - great #SysRevs Commentary by Gough, Thomas & Oliver: https:/…
Clarifying differences between review designs & methods - great #SysRevs Commentary by Gough, Thomas & Oliver: https://t.co/izukPcZfVF
RT @MedicalEvidence: Clarifying differences between review designs & methods - great Commentary from David Gough et al via #SysRevs: https:…
RT @MedicalEvidence: Clarifying differences between review designs & methods - great Commentary from David Gough et al via #SysRevs: https:…
RT @MedicalEvidence: Clarifying differences between review designs & methods - great Commentary from David Gough et al via #SysRevs: https:…
Clarifying differences between review designs & methods - great Commentary from David Gough et al via #SysRevs: https://t.co/X99rudgzt6
Clarifying differences between review designs & methods, wise words from David Gough et al via #SysRevs: http://t.co/cNBjhOLyc2
2/5 Gough et al 'Clarifying differences between review designs and methods' 2012 http://t.co/dBX1CdbpgZ @jduncanmillar @GavinQWylie
Really helpful article summarising differences between #systematicreview designs from @EPPICentre team http://t.co/M7nkFZiLbN
Really helpful article summarising differences between #systematicreview designs from @EPPICentre team http://t.co/M7nkFZiLbN
Really helpful article summarising differences between #systematicreview designs from @EPPICentre team http://t.co/M7nkFZiLbN
Really helpful article summarising differences between #systematicreview designs from @EPPICentre team http://t.co/M7nkFZiLbN
Really helpful article summarising differences between #systematicreview designs from @EPPICentre team http://t.co/M7nkFZiLbN
Really helpful article summarising differences between #systematicreview designs from @EPPICentre team http://t.co/M7nkFZiLbN
Really helpful article summarising differences between #systematicreview designs from @EPPICentre team http://t.co/M7nkFZiLbN
Really helpful article summarising differences between #systematicreview designs from @EPPICentre team http://t.co/M7nkFZiLbN
Really helpful article summarising differences between #systematicreview designs from @EPPICentre team http://t.co/M7nkFZiLbN
Really helpful article summarising differences between #systematicreview designs from @EPPICentre team http://t.co/M7nkFZiLbN
http://t.co/AxC8vRRTD5 @profsandyoliver thanks for sharing this article on systematic reviewing including mixed methods reviews
Clarifying differences between review designs and methods http://t.co/DnIyDHlted Great piece by D Gough @profsandyoliver @James_M_Thomas
Clarifying differences between review designs and methods http://t.co/omDxr9Wpgp
Tx @AmyPricePhD @Dominic_Hurst @smickan You may also be interested in diversity of reviews http://t.co/X7AyBiW8tn & http://t.co/bZOTdsHPrm
Clarifying differences between review designs and methods http://t.co/omDxr9Wpgp
http://t.co/AxC8vRRTD5 @profsandyoliver thanks for sharing this article on systematic reviewing including mixed methods reviews
Tx @AmyPricePhD @Dominic_Hurst @smickan You may also be interested in diversity of reviews http://t.co/X7AyBiW8tn & http://t.co/bZOTdsHPrm
Tx @AmyPricePhD @Dominic_Hurst @smickan You may also be interested in diversity of reviews http://t.co/X7AyBiW8tn & http://t.co/bZOTdsHPrm
Hi @AmyPricePhD This summarises how we see choice of approaches to systematic reviewing (based on book) http://t.co/gA1TYEYwRB
Hi @AmyPricePhD This summarises how we see choice of approaches to systematic reviewing (based on book) http://t.co/gA1TYEYwRB
Hi @AmyPricePhD This summarises how we see choice of approaches to systematic reviewing (based on book) http://t.co/gA1TYEYwRB
Hi @AmyPricePhD This summarises how we see choice of approaches to systematic reviewing (based on book) http://t.co/gA1TYEYwRB
@AlexsPollock Then you may be interested in http://t.co/NdpLxH73 (also #openaccess) and our book http://t.co/QDAKZ1tD (sadly not)@EPPICentre
Dangers of meta-analyses with few trials/patients http://t.co/AVvj6Vzd @tpklassen; synthesise to build theory instead http://t.co/NdpLxH73
Dangers of meta-analyses with few trials/patients http://t.co/AVvj6Vzd @tpklassen; synthesise to build theory instead http://t.co/NdpLxH73
Dangers of meta-analyses with few trials/patients http://t.co/AVvj6Vzd @tpklassen; synthesise to build theory instead http://t.co/NdpLxH73
Dangers of meta-analyses with few trials/patients http://t.co/AVvj6Vzd @tpklassen; synthesise to build theory instead http://t.co/NdpLxH73
RT @SCPHRP: Methodology: Clarifying differences between review designs and methods http://t.co/rSW01Oi8
Methodology: Clarifying differences between review designs and methods http://t.co/rSW01Oi8
RT @carinavr: Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. By @profsandyoliver e al 2012 http://t.co/AnqFQ7Ej #systematicreview
RT @radagabriel: Differences between review designs and methods. By @profsandyoliver http://t.co/0Mm57o2y" /Imperdible para interesados en métodos d síntesis
RT @UnIPSS: Diferencias entre distintos métodos de síntesis y cómo avanzar. @profsandyoliver y cols http://t.co/xh5c3AOm Muy clarficador!
RT @UnIPSS: Diferencias entre distintos métodos de síntesis y cómo avanzar. @profsandyoliver y cols http://t.co/xh5c3AOm Muy clarficador!
RT @radagabriel: Differences between review designs and methods. By @profsandyoliver http://t.co/0Mm57o2y" /Imperdible para interesados en métodos d síntesis
RT @radagabriel: Differences between review designs and methods. By @profsandyoliver http://t.co/0Mm57o2y" /Imperdible para interesados en métodos d síntesis
Diferencias entre distintos métodos de síntesis y cómo avanzar. @profsandyoliver y cols http://t.co/xh5c3AOm Muy clarficador!
Differences between review designs and methods. By @profsandyoliver http://t.co/0Mm57o2y" /Imperdible para interesados en métodos d síntesis
RT @carinavr: Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. By @profsandyoliver e al 2012 http://t.co/AnqFQ7Ej #systematicreview
RT @carinavr: Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. By @profsandyoliver e al 2012 http://t.co/AnqFQ7Ej #systematicreview
Paper: Systematic Reviews | Clarifying differences between review designs and methods http://t.co/LFsoxKTD via @SCPHRP
Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. By @profsandyoliver e al 2012 http://t.co/AnqFQ7Ej #systematicreview
RT @researchimpact: RT @SCPHRP: Commentary on clarifying differences between systematic review designs and methods http://t.co/9ICEzqv9
RT @researchimpact: RT @SCPHRP: Commentary on clarifying differences between systematic review designs and methods http://t.co/9ICEzqv9
RT @SCPHRP: Commentary on clarifying differences between systematic review designs and methods http://t.co/9ICEzqv9
For the systematic reviewers amongst us: Commentary on clarifying differences between review designs and methods http://t.co/Igc19XVs