↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of complete conservative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (bracing and exercises) based on SOSORT management criteria: results according to the SRS criteria for bracing…

Overview of attention for article published in Scoliosis, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Effectiveness of complete conservative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (bracing and exercises) based on SOSORT management criteria: results according to the SRS criteria for bracing studies - SOSORT Award 2009 Winner
Published in
Scoliosis, September 2009
DOI 10.1186/1748-7161-4-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefano Negrini, Salvatore Atanasio, Claudia Fusco, Fabio Zaina

Abstract

The SRS criteria give the methodological reference framework for the presentation of bracing results, while the SOSORT criteria give the clinical reference framework for an appropriate bracing treatment. The two have not been combined in a study until now. Our aim was to verify the efficacy of a complete, conservative treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS)according to the best methodological and management criteria defined in the literature.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Luxembourg 1 2%
Unknown 65 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Postgraduate 8 12%
Researcher 8 12%
Other 21 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 64%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 2 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2012.
All research outputs
#9,958,418
of 12,440,051 outputs
Outputs from Scoliosis
#145
of 192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,184
of 119,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scoliosis
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,440,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 192 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.