| Title |
A perl package and an alignment tool for phylogenetic networks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, March 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-9-175 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gabriel Cardona, Francesc Rosselló, Gabriel Valiente |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 39 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 23% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 60% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 10% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,609,687
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,057
of 7,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,804
of 81,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#19
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,350 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.