↓ Skip to main content

Is there a gap between recommended and ‘real world’ practice in the management of depression in young people? A medical file audit of practice

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Is there a gap between recommended and ‘real world’ practice in the management of depression in young people? A medical file audit of practice
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-178
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah E Hetrick, Andrew Thompson, Kally Yuen, Sue Finch, Alexandra G Parker

Abstract

Literature has shown that dissemination of guidelines alone is insufficient to ensure that guideline recommendations are incorporated into every day clinical practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 70 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 5 7%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 26%
Psychology 12 16%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 16 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2012.
All research outputs
#7,410,791
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,594
of 7,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,970
of 165,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#40
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.