↓ Skip to main content

Is there a gap between recommended and ‘real world’ practice in the management of depression in young people? A medical file audit of practice

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Is there a gap between recommended and ‘real world’ practice in the management of depression in young people? A medical file audit of practice
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-178
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah E Hetrick, Andrew Thompson, Kally Yuen, Sue Finch, Alexandra G Parker

Abstract

Literature has shown that dissemination of guidelines alone is insufficient to ensure that guideline recommendations are incorporated into every day clinical practice.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 44 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 19%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Other 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 31%
Psychology 7 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 6 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2012.
All research outputs
#3,673,779
of 14,126,589 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,782
of 4,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,054
of 122,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,126,589 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them