↓ Skip to main content

Huntington's Disease and its therapeutic target genes: a global functional profile based on the HD Research Crossroads database

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neurology, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Huntington's Disease and its therapeutic target genes: a global functional profile based on the HD Research Crossroads database
Published in
BMC Neurology, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2377-12-47
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ravi Kiran Reddy Kalathur, Miguel A Hernández-Prieto, Matthias E Futschik

Abstract

Huntington's disease (HD) is a fatal progressive neurodegenerative disorder caused by the expansion of the polyglutamine repeat region in the huntingtin gene. Although the disease is triggered by the mutation of a single gene, intensive research has linked numerous other genes to its pathogenesis. To obtain a systematic overview of these genes, which may serve as therapeutic targets, CHDI Foundation has recently established the HD Research Crossroads database. With currently over 800 cataloged genes, this web-based resource constitutes the most extensive curation of genes relevant to HD. It provides us with an unprecedented opportunity to survey molecular mechanisms involved in HD in a holistic manner.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 66 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 25%
Student > Bachelor 14 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Master 8 11%
Other 6 8%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 10%
Neuroscience 5 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 10 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,856,748
of 23,452,723 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#163
of 2,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,683
of 165,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#4
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,452,723 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.