↓ Skip to main content

ACL graft failure location differs between allografts and autografts

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation, Therapy & Technology, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
ACL graft failure location differs between allografts and autografts
Published in
Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation, Therapy & Technology, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1758-2555-4-22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert A Magnussen, Dean C Taylor, Alison P Toth, William E Garrett

Abstract

Between 5 and 20% of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction fail and require revision. Animal studies have demonstrated slower incorporation of allograft tissue, which may affect the mechanism of graft failure. The purpose of this study is to determine the location of traumatic graft failure following ACL reconstruction and investigate differences in failure patterns between autografts and allografts.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Chile 1 3%
Unknown 36 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 18%
Student > Master 7 18%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 55%
Engineering 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2013.
All research outputs
#8,253,806
of 13,162,734 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation, Therapy & Technology
#25
of 49 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,447
of 121,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation, Therapy & Technology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,162,734 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 49 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one scored the same or higher as 24 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.