↓ Skip to main content

Using mid-level cadres as substitutes for internationally mobile health professionals in Africa. A desk review

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
221 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
348 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Using mid-level cadres as substitutes for internationally mobile health professionals in Africa. A desk review
Published in
Human Resources for Health, June 2004
DOI 10.1186/1478-4491-2-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Delanyo Dovlo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 348 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
South Africa 3 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Mali 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 330 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 72 21%
Researcher 46 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 11%
Student > Postgraduate 31 9%
Student > Bachelor 25 7%
Other 85 24%
Unknown 50 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 114 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 12%
Social Sciences 33 9%
Engineering 15 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 4%
Other 69 20%
Unknown 61 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#855
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,025
of 59,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.