| Title |
Wound healing activities of different extracts of Centella asiatica in incision and burn wound models: an experimental animal study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6882-12-103 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juraiporn Somboonwong, Mattana Kankaisre, Boonyong Tantisira, Mayuree H Tantisira |
| Abstract |
The efficacy of Centella asiatica for incision and burn wounds are not fully understood. Here, we report the wound healing activities of sequential hexane, ethyl acetate, methanol, and water extracts of Centella asiatica in incision and partial-thickness burn wound models in rats. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 419 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 414 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 82 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 8% |
| Researcher | 33 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 21 | 5% |
| Other | 66 | 16% |
| Unknown | 147 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 51 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 23 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 11% |
| Unknown | 160 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2021.
All research outputs
#684,090
of 25,382,035 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#91
of 3,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,367
of 176,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#4
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,035 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.