↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness and content analysis of interventions to enhance medication adherence in hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Effectiveness and content analysis of interventions to enhance medication adherence in hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
Published in
Systematic Reviews, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13643-016-0278-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eimear C. Morrissey, Hannah Durand, Robby Nieuwlaat, Tamara Navarro, R. Brian Haynes, Jane C. Walsh, Gerard J. Molloy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 5 6%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 33 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 12%
Psychology 5 6%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 37 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,193,269
of 25,501,527 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,301
of 2,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,951
of 355,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#21
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,501,527 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.