2) Psychometric methods that allow to compare & align alternative measures, to exactly NOT rely on a particular conceptualisation or legacy measure. This is a bit technical, but we discuss this approach for example here: https://t.co/l6GXA3U0VZ #Psyc
Some examples regarding accuracy & efficiency, e.g. from @DrCGibbons's lab: https://t.co/aCmfThcG9O Application: https://t.co/slwB3dzhnL Or our old lab at @MHARG_york: https://t.co/l6GXA3U0VZ https://t.co/Qfe4YdyDlf #OpenAccess @Tim_J_Croudace @Jan
RT @jrboehnke: One problem w short scales: Even when optimising item presentation via CAT it is difficult to get away w fewer than 5 questi…
RT @jrboehnke: One problem w short scales: Even when optimising item presentation via CAT it is difficult to get away w fewer than 5 questi…
One problem w short scales: Even when optimising item presentation via CAT it is difficult to get away w fewer than 5 questions: https://t.co/e8lcfojxvy See also this paper led by @JanStochl testing scenarios in a related domain: https://t.co/l6GXA3U0VZ
@aidangcw @tkaiser_science @DepressionLab @LutzPsychRes @kdej_psyres But I also agree, the literature often ignores the required level of precision for an application. Conf intervals around individual scores require quite high precision -- i.e. a number of
From our #jinglejangle research: - GHQ12 essentially unidimensional in broader itemset: https://t.co/aFbHWRcScH - Specific variance in GHQ12 positive items does not correlate with that from similar instrument: https://t.co/l6GXA3U0VZ #openaccess #psycho
@EikoFried @JkayFlake @R__INDEX @JnfrLTackett @aidangcw "Insightful" is a mouthful... 2 humble attempts of mine: https://t.co/GVasMwKAwp [if there is an "insightful" paper, it is at least referenced; GHQ-12, WEMWBS] Quote👇is from the prob. more interestin
An evaluation of computerized adaptive testing for general psychological distress:combining GHQ-12 and ... https://t.co/8ak2qmZ3I6 #wrro