↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of economic evaluations of cardiac rehabilitation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
Title
A systematic review of economic evaluations of cardiac rehabilitation
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-243
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wai Pong Wong, Jun Feng, Keng Ho Pwee, Jeremy Lim

Abstract

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR), a multidisciplinary program consisting of exercise, risk factor modification and psychosocial intervention, forms an integral part of managing patients after myocardial infarction (MI), revascularization surgery and percutaneous coronary interventions, as well as patients with heart failure (HF). This systematic review seeks to examine the cost-effectiveness of CR for patients with MI or HF and inform policy makers in Singapore on published cost-effectiveness studies on CR.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Spain 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 159 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 16%
Researcher 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Other 43 25%
Unknown 14 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 15%
Sports and Recreations 11 6%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Psychology 9 5%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 23 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2012.
All research outputs
#3,225,037
of 12,372,945 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,532
of 4,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,687
of 123,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#17
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,372,945 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.