↓ Skip to main content

Medication documentation in a primary care network serving North Carolina medicaid patients: results of a cross-sectional chart review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Family Practice, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Medication documentation in a primary care network serving North Carolina medicaid patients: results of a cross-sectional chart review
Published in
BMC Family Practice, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-13-83
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew D Olson, Gretchen L Tong, Beat D Steiner, Anthony J Viera, Evan Ashkin, Warren P Newton

Abstract

Medical records that do not accurately reflect the patient's current medication list are an open invitation to errors and may compromise patient safety.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
Unknown 45 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 14 29%
Unknown 12 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 17%
Unspecified 5 10%
Chemistry 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 12 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2013.
All research outputs
#7,762,767
of 12,373,620 outputs
Outputs from BMC Family Practice
#883
of 1,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,323
of 123,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Family Practice
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,373,620 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.