↓ Skip to main content

Mujer Mas Segura(Safer Women): a combination prevention intervention to reduce sexual and injection risks among female sex workers who inject drugs

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Mujer Mas Segura(Safer Women): a combination prevention intervention to reduce sexual and injection risks among female sex workers who inject drugs
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-653
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alicia Vera, Daniela Abramovitz, Remedios Lozada, Gustavo Martinez, M Gudelia Rangel, Hugo Staines, Thomas L Patterson, Steffanie A Strathdee

Abstract

Female sex workers who inject drugs (FSW-IDUs) are at risk of acquiring HIV, sexually transmitted infections (STI) and blood-borne infections through unprotected sex and sharing injection equipment. We conducted a 2×2 factorial randomized controlled trial to evaluate combination interventions to simultaneously reduce sexual and injection risks among FSW-IDUs in Tijuana and Ciudad Juarez, Mexico.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Portugal 1 1%
Hong Kong 1 1%
Unknown 75 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 16%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 18 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 33%
Social Sciences 14 18%
Unspecified 9 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Psychology 9 11%
Other 12 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2012.
All research outputs
#6,983,526
of 12,372,633 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,449
of 8,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,376
of 124,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#59
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,372,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.