Title |
Does dissemination extend beyond publication: a survey of a cross section of public funded research in the UK
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, August 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-5-61 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Paul M Wilson, Mark Petticrew, Michael W Calnan, Irwin Nazareth |
Abstract |
In the UK, most funding bodies now expect a commitment or effort on the part of grant holders to disseminate the findings of their research. The emphasis is on ensuring that publicly funded research is made available, can be used to support decision making, and ultimately improve the quality and delivery of healthcare provided. In this study, we aimed to describe the dissemination practices and impacts of applied and public health researchers working across the UK. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Arab Emirates | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 5 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 95 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 20% |
Researcher | 17 | 16% |
Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
Other | 7 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
Other | 21 | 20% |
Unknown | 18 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 26 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
Psychology | 6 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Other | 20 | 19% |
Unknown | 23 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2012.
All research outputs
#18,312,024
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,642
of 1,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,668
of 94,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.