↓ Skip to main content

Sustainability of return to work in sick-listed employees with low-back pain. Two-year follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing multidisciplinary and brief intervention

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Sustainability of return to work in sick-listed employees with low-back pain. Two-year follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing multidisciplinary and brief intervention
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-13-156
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chris Jensen, Ole Kudsk Jensen, Claus Vinther Nielsen

Abstract

Sick-listed employees with low back pain had similar return to work (RTW) rates at one-year follow-up in a randomized trial comparing two interventions, but the effects were modified by specific workplace related factors. The present study addressed the sustainability of the intervention effects by performing a two-year follow-up and by using different outcome measures.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 75 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 21%
Unspecified 9 12%
Researcher 9 12%
Librarian 8 11%
Other 18 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 39%
Unspecified 12 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 14%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Psychology 4 5%
Other 12 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2012.
All research outputs
#9,906,370
of 12,373,620 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,944
of 2,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,620
of 125,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#23
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,373,620 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.