The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||20||67%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||5||17%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 357 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||70||20%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||43||12%|
|Student > Bachelor||25||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||147||41%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||35||10%|
|Economics, Econometrics and Finance||11||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2020.
All research outputs
of 24,920,664 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
of 2,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 192,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,920,664 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.