↓ Skip to main content

How evidence-based is an 'evidence-based parenting program'? A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis of Triple P

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
78 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
How evidence-based is an 'evidence-based parenting program'? A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis of Triple P
Published in
BMC Medicine, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-10-130
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip Wilson, Robert Rush, Susan Hussey, Christine Puckering, Fiona Sim, Clare S Allely, Paul Doku, Alex McConnachie, Christopher Gillberg

Abstract

Interventions to promote positive parenting are often reported to offer good outcomes for children but they can consume substantial resources and they require rigorous appraisal.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 159 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 23%
Student > Master 35 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 10%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 10 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 59 36%
Social Sciences 42 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 21 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2019.
All research outputs
#193,774
of 14,316,786 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#173
of 2,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,412
of 149,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#12
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,316,786 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.