| Title |
Once a clinician, always a clinician: a systematic review to develop a typology of clinician-researcher dual-role experiences in health research with patient-participants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-016-0203-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
E. Jean C. Hay-Smith, Melanie Brown, Lynley Anderson, Gareth J. Treharne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 42% |
| New Zealand | 4 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 134 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 10% |
| Researcher | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 20% |
| Unknown | 29 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 18% |
| Psychology | 16 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 37 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,566,755
of 24,682,395 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#190
of 2,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,292
of 369,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#3
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,682,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.