↓ Skip to main content

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a participative community singing programme as a health promotion initiative for older people: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a participative community singing programme as a health promotion initiative for older people: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-142
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ann Skingley, Stephen M Clift, Simon P Coulton, John Rodriguez

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 3%
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 150 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 19%
Student > Master 27 17%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Researcher 16 10%
Other 9 6%
Other 31 20%
Unknown 26 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 15%
Social Sciences 23 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 12%
Arts and Humanities 17 11%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 28 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2017.
All research outputs
#15,381,871
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,384
of 14,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,432
of 108,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#87
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.