↓ Skip to main content

Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
29 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
686 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
847 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-12-181
Pubmed ID
Authors

Allison Tong, Kate Flemming, Elizabeth McInnes, Sandy Oliver, Jonathan Craig

Abstract

The syntheses of multiple qualitative studies can pull together data across different contexts, generate new theoretical or conceptual models, identify research gaps, and provide evidence for the development, implementation and evaluation of health interventions. This study aims to develop a framework for reporting the synthesis of qualitative health research.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 847 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 14 2%
Canada 7 <1%
South Africa 3 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 9 1%
Unknown 802 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 176 21%
Student > Master 174 21%
Researcher 122 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 70 8%
Student > Postgraduate 60 7%
Other 172 20%
Unknown 73 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 238 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 147 17%
Social Sciences 142 17%
Psychology 80 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 25 3%
Other 94 11%
Unknown 121 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2020.
All research outputs
#897,299
of 14,330,165 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#134
of 1,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,270
of 250,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#4
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,330,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.