↓ Skip to main content

The Biological Big Bang model for the major transitions in evolution

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Direct, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 536)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
295 Mendeley
citeulike
10 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
The Biological Big Bang model for the major transitions in evolution
Published in
Biology Direct, August 2007
DOI 10.1186/1745-6150-2-21
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eugene V Koonin

Abstract

Major transitions in biological evolution show the same pattern of sudden emergence of diverse forms at a new level of complexity. The relationships between major groups within an emergent new class of biological entities are hard to decipher and do not seem to fit the tree pattern that, following Darwin's original proposal, remains the dominant description of biological evolution. The cases in point include the origin of complex RNA molecules and protein folds; major groups of viruses; archaea and bacteria, and the principal lineages within each of these prokaryotic domains; eukaryotic supergroups; and animal phyla. In each of these pivotal nexuses in life's history, the principal "types" seem to appear rapidly and fully equipped with the signature features of the respective new level of biological organization. No intermediate "grades" or intermediate forms between different types are detectable. Usually, this pattern is attributed to cladogenesis compressed in time, combined with the inevitable erosion of the phylogenetic signal.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 295 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 4%
United Kingdom 7 2%
Brazil 5 2%
Germany 4 1%
Netherlands 3 1%
Chile 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Turkey 2 <1%
Other 16 5%
Unknown 241 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 81 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 20%
Student > Master 33 11%
Student > Bachelor 22 7%
Professor 19 6%
Other 57 19%
Unknown 23 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 177 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 8%
Physics and Astronomy 6 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 2%
Other 46 16%
Unknown 31 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,590,581
of 25,376,646 outputs
Outputs from Biology Direct
#45
of 536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,929
of 75,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Direct
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,376,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them