↓ Skip to main content

Prescribing ANtiDepressants Appropriately (PANDA): a cluster randomized controlled trial in primary care

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Family Practice, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Prescribing ANtiDepressants Appropriately (PANDA): a cluster randomized controlled trial in primary care
Published in
BMC Family Practice, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-14-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esther Muskens, Rhona Eveleigh, Peter Lucassen, Chris van Weel, Jan Spijker, Peter Verhaak, Anne Speckens, Richard Oude Voshaar

Abstract

Inappropriate use of antidepressants (AD), defined as either continuation in the absence of a proper indication or continuation despite the lack of therapeutic efficacy, applies to approximately half of all long term AD users.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 13%
Other 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 39%
Psychology 11 20%
Unspecified 6 11%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 11 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2018.
All research outputs
#3,921,590
of 13,559,548 outputs
Outputs from BMC Family Practice
#562
of 1,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,174
of 250,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Family Practice
#34
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,559,548 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,357 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.