↓ Skip to main content

HPV vaccines and cancer prevention, science versus activism

Overview of attention for article published in Infectious Agents and Cancer, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 617)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
144 X users
facebook
69 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
HPV vaccines and cancer prevention, science versus activism
Published in
Infectious Agents and Cancer, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1750-9378-8-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucija Tomljenovic, Judy Wilyman, Eva Vanamee, Toni Bark, Christopher A Shaw

Abstract

The rationale behind current worldwide human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination programs starts from two basic premises, 1) that HPV vaccines will prevent cervical cancers and save lives and, 2) have no risk of serious side effects. Therefore, efforts should be made to get as many pre-adolescent girls vaccinated in order to decrease the burden of cervical cancer. Careful analysis of HPV vaccine pre- and post-licensure data shows however that both of these premises are at odds with factual evidence and are largely derived from significant misinterpretation of available data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 144 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 26%
Other 8 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 7 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 123. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#344,293
of 25,701,027 outputs
Outputs from Infectious Agents and Cancer
#9
of 617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,437
of 292,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infectious Agents and Cancer
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,701,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.