↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of Australia’s Get Healthy Information and Coaching Service®: maintenance of self-reported anthropometric and behavioural changes after program completion

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Effectiveness of Australia’s Get Healthy Information and Coaching Service®: maintenance of self-reported anthropometric and behavioural changes after program completion
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-175
Pubmed ID
Authors

Blythe J O’Hara, Philayrath Phongsavan, Elizabeth G Eakin, Elizabeth Develin, Joanne Smith, Mark Greenaway, Adrian E Bauman

Abstract

The Get Healthy Information and Coaching Service (GHS) is a population-wide telephone-based program aimed at assisting adults to implement lifestyle improvements. It is a relatively uncommon example of the translation of efficacious trials to up-scaled real-world application. GHS participants who completed the 6-month coaching program made significant initial improvements to their weight, waist circumference, Body Mass Index (BMI), physical activity and nutrition behaviours. This study examines the maintenance of anthropometric and behaviour change improvements 6-months after program completion.

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 76 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 24 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 14%
Psychology 9 11%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 28 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2013.
All research outputs
#6,907,360
of 26,542,140 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,312
of 18,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,498
of 207,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#86
of 291 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,542,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 291 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.