↓ Skip to main content

Separating the wheat from the chaff: mitigating the effects of noise in a plastome phylogenomic data set from Pinus L. (Pinaceae)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Separating the wheat from the chaff: mitigating the effects of noise in a plastome phylogenomic data set from Pinus L. (Pinaceae)
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-12-100
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew Parks, Richard Cronn, Aaron Liston

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Brazil 2 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 105 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 18%
Student > Master 19 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Professor 8 7%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 13 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 11%
Environmental Science 5 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 14 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,938,614
of 25,380,459 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,634
of 3,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,596
of 171,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#9
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,380,459 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.