↓ Skip to main content

Practice patterns of doctors of chiropractic with a pediatric diplomate: a cross-sectional survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Practice patterns of doctors of chiropractic with a pediatric diplomate: a cross-sectional survey
Published in
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-10-26
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine A Pohlman, Maria A Hondras, Cynthia R Long, Andrea G Haan

Abstract

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is growing in popularity, especially within the pediatric population. Research on CAM practitioners and their specialties, such as pediatrics, is lacking. Within the chiropractic profession, pediatrics is one of the most recently established post-graduate specialty programs. This paper describes the demographic and practice characteristics of doctors of chiropractic with a pediatric diplomate.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 23%
Student > Master 7 15%
Unspecified 6 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Other 12 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 15%
Unspecified 7 15%
Psychology 6 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Other 8 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2013.
All research outputs
#2,015,188
of 3,633,986 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
#773
of 1,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,640
of 85,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
#45
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,633,986 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,228 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.