↓ Skip to main content

Recruitment and retention of women in a large randomized control trial to reduce repeat preterm births: the Philadelphia Collaborative Preterm Prevention Project

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Recruitment and retention of women in a large randomized control trial to reduce repeat preterm births: the Philadelphia Collaborative Preterm Prevention Project
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, September 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-10-88
Pubmed ID
Authors

David A Webb, James C Coyne, Robert L Goldenberg, Vijaya K Hogan, Irma T Elo, Joan R Bloch, Leny Mathew, Ian M Bennett, Erika F Dennis, Jennifer F Culhane

Abstract

Recruitment and retention of patients for randomized control trial (RCT) studies can provide formidable challenges, particularly with minority and underserved populations. Data are reported for the Philadelphia Collaborative Preterm Prevention Project (PCPPP), a large RCT targeting risk factors for repeat preterm births among women who previously delivered premature (< 35 weeks gestation) infants.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Romania 1 1%
Unknown 69 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 31%
Social Sciences 12 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Psychology 7 10%
Design 1 1%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 10 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2019.
All research outputs
#867,389
of 14,185,873 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#124
of 1,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,910
of 116,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,185,873 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them