Review by Russell A. Poldrack
The authors have addressed all of my previous concerns. Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely related research…
The authors have addressed all of my previous concerns. Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely related research…
Thank you for addressing my concerns. I have nothing further to add and recommend acceptance of the manuscript as is. Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely…
The authors do a nice job of describing the fMRI and accompanying data featured in their article "Single subject fMRI test–retest reliability metrics and confounding factors" in the journal NeuroImage.
This data paper describes a dataset with 10 subjects’ worth of fMRI data across two sessions, for the purposes of assessment of test-retest reliability. This dataset could certainly be of use to…
This is a short note describing a data set collected by the authors. The data has been clearly described and methods referenced. Is the rationale for collecting and analyzing the data well defined?