The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
Snake bite mimicking brain death
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cases Journal, June 2008
|
DOI | 10.1186/1757-1626-1-16 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joseph John, Bahubali D Gane, Nishad Plakkal, Rajeswari Aghoram, Sowmya Sampath |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 2 | 6% |
India | 1 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 30 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 6 | 18% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 15% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
Professor | 3 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
Other | 9 | 26% |
Unknown | 5 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 32% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 21% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 7 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2023.
All research outputs
#6,111,335
of 23,549,388 outputs
Outputs from Cases Journal
#50
of 253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,641
of 83,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cases Journal
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,549,388 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.