↓ Skip to main content

Evidence of effective scrapie transmission via colostrum and milk in sheep

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Veterinary Research, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Evidence of effective scrapie transmission via colostrum and milk in sheep
Published in
BMC Veterinary Research, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-6148-9-99
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timm Konold, S J Moore, Susan J Bellworthy, Linda A Terry, Leigh Thorne, Andrew Ramsay, F J Salguero, Marion M Simmons, Hugh A Simmons, S Jo Moore, F Javier Salguero, Konold T, Moore SJ, Bellworthy SJ, Terry LA, Thorne L, Ramsay A, Salguero FJ, Simmons MM, Simmons HA, S Moore, F Salguero

Abstract

Evidence for scrapie transmission from VRQ/VRQ ewes to lambs via milk was first reported in 2008 but in that study there were concerns that lateral transmission may have contributed to the high transmission rate observed since five control lambs housed with the milk recipients also became infected. This report provides further information obtained from two follow-up studies, one where milk recipients were housed separately after milk consumption to confirm the validity of the high scrapie transmission rate via milk and the second to assess any difference in infectivity from colostrum and subsequent milk. Protein misfolding cyclic amplification (PMCA) was also used to detect prion protein in milk samples as a comparison with the infectivity data and extended to milk samples from ewes without a VRQ allele.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 23%
Researcher 7 20%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Unspecified 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 23%
Unspecified 3 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Other 4 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2014.
All research outputs
#2,112,346
of 10,720,598 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#143
of 1,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,662
of 128,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#2
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,720,598 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,514 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.