↓ Skip to main content

Cost-utility of routine cataract surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Cost-utility of routine cataract surgery
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, September 2006
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-4-74
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pirjo Räsänen, Kari Krootila, Harri Sintonen, Tiina Leivo, Anna-Maija Koivisto, Olli-Pekka Ryynänen, Marja Blom, Risto P Roine

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 21%
Researcher 7 18%
Other 5 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 54%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Decision Sciences 2 5%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2008.
All research outputs
#3,603,583
of 12,439,665 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#433
of 1,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,669
of 353,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#16
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,439,665 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,342 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.