↓ Skip to main content

Attrition in longitudinal randomized controlled trials: home visits make a difference

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Attrition in longitudinal randomized controlled trials: home visits make a difference
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-12-178
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janey C Peterson, Paul A Pirraglia, Martin T Wells, Mary E Charlson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 20%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Postgraduate 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Psychology 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 8 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2017.
All research outputs
#9,905,962
of 12,373,180 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#916
of 1,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,284
of 346,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#113
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,373,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.