↓ Skip to main content

Integrated maternal and child health services in Mozambique: structural health system limitations overshadow its effect on follow-up of HIV-exposed infants

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Integrated maternal and child health services in Mozambique: structural health system limitations overshadow its effect on follow-up of HIV-exposed infants
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-207
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diederike Geelhoed, Yves Lafort, Élder Chissale, Baltazar Candrinho, Olivier Degomme

Abstract

The follow-up of HIV-exposed infants remains a public health challenge in many Sub-Saharan countries. Just as integrated antenatal and maternity services have contributed to improved care for HIV-positive pregnant women, so too could integrated care for mother and infant after birth improve follow-up of HIV-exposed infants. We present results of a study testing the viability of such integrated care, and its effects on follow-up of HIV-exposed infants, in Tete Province, Mozambique.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 75 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 26%
Researcher 14 18%
Unspecified 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Other 4 5%
Other 22 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 45%
Social Sciences 12 15%
Unspecified 11 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 6%
Other 8 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2013.
All research outputs
#6,508,993
of 12,372,945 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,146
of 4,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,719
of 146,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,372,945 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.