↓ Skip to main content

Geographic prediction of tuberculosis clusters in Fukuoka, Japan, using the space-time scan statistic

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
Title
Geographic prediction of tuberculosis clusters in Fukuoka, Japan, using the space-time scan statistic
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, April 2007
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-7-26
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daisuke Onozuka, Akihito Hagihara

Timeline
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Ghana 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 123 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 19%
Student > Master 20 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 8 6%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 28 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 33%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Computer Science 9 7%
Environmental Science 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 28 21%
Unknown 32 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,512,050
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,566
of 7,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,778
of 75,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.