↓ Skip to main content

Compliance with clinical guidelines for whiplash improved with a targeted implementation strategy: a prospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Compliance with clinical guidelines for whiplash improved with a targeted implementation strategy: a prospective cohort study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-213
Pubmed ID
Authors

Trudy Rebbeck, Luciana G Macedo, Christopher G Maher

Abstract

Implementation strategies for clinical guidelines have shown modest effects in changing health professional's knowledge and practice, however, targeted implementations are suggested to achieve greater improvements. This study aimed to examine the effect of a targeted implementation strategy of the Australian whiplash guidelines on health professionals' knowledge, beliefs and practice and to identify predictors of improved knowledge.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 28%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 13%
Unspecified 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 13 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 28%
Unspecified 8 17%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 5 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2013.
All research outputs
#6,352,413
of 11,344,222 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,079
of 3,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,813
of 133,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#58
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,344,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,598 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.