↓ Skip to main content

Open access to tree genomes: the path to a better forest

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Open access to tree genomes: the path to a better forest
Published in
Genome Biology, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/gb-2013-14-6-120
Pubmed ID
Authors

David B Neale, Charles H Langley, Steven L Salzberg, Jill L Wegrzyn

Abstract

An open-access culture and a well-developed comparative-genomics infrastructure must be developed in forest trees to derive the full potential of genome sequencing in this diverse group of plants that are the dominant species in much of the earth's terrestrial ecosystems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Argentina 1 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
Greece 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 85 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 20%
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Professor 5 5%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 16%
Computer Science 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 11 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2017.
All research outputs
#8,515,019
of 25,391,066 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,486
of 4,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,857
of 208,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#43
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,391,066 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,461 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.