↓ Skip to main content

Definition of a core set of quality indicators for the assessment of HIV/AIDS clinical care: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Definition of a core set of quality indicators for the assessment of HIV/AIDS clinical care: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-236
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emanuel Catumbela, Victor Certal, Alberto Freitas, Carlos Costa, António Sarmento, Altamiro da Costa Pereira

Abstract

Several organizations and individual authors have been proposing quality indicators for the assessment of clinical care in HIV/AIDS patients. Nevertheless, the definition of a consensual core set of indicators remains controversial and its practical use is largely limited. This study aims not only to identify and characterize these indicators through a systematic literature review but also to propose a parsimonious model based on those most used.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 52 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 20%
Student > Master 11 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Other 16 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 46%
Unspecified 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Engineering 4 7%
Other 12 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2013.
All research outputs
#3,391,996
of 12,078,156 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,643
of 3,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,894
of 135,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#44
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,078,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,930 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.