RT @ExeterTestGroup: Research waste in diagnostic trials https://t.co/frM8QX7y9R #ExeterTestClub next Tues 4th April 4pm 1.23 @ExeterMed ht…
RT @BioMedCentral: Popular #Trials research of 2017 so far, #3 - Research waste in diagnostic trials: https://t.co/TaQRuYcVFG https://t.co…
RT @BioMedCentral: Popular #Trials research of 2017 so far, #3 - Research waste in diagnostic trials: https://t.co/TaQRuYcVFG https://t.co…
RT @BioMedCentral: Popular #Trials research of 2017 so far, #3 - Research waste in diagnostic trials: https://t.co/TaQRuYcVFG https://t.co…
RT @BioMedCentral: Popular #Trials research of 2017 so far, #3 - Research waste in diagnostic trials: https://t.co/TaQRuYcVFG https://t.co…
Popular #Trials research of 2017 so far, #3 - Research waste in diagnostic trials: https://t.co/TaQRuYcVFG https://t.co/EM7yODA0dK
RT @ExeterTestGroup: Waste in diagnostic trials: #ExeterTestClub Tues 4th April 4pm 1.23SC https://t.co/gQdXygmDlr https://t.co/8rLm1q5wfw…
Reminder of today's #ExeterTestClub at 4pm [1.23SC]. Discussing research waste in diagnostic trials via these papers. Everyone very welcome! https://t.co/JORHez80XH
Tomorrow's 4pm Test Club topic: diagnostic trials & research waste https://t.co/EFwqbKA2sc Tweet comments/questions using #ExeterTestClub https://t.co/JORHez80XH
RT @ExeterTestGroup: Waste in diagnostic trials: #ExeterTestClub Tues 4th April 4pm 1.23SC https://t.co/gQdXygmDlr https://t.co/8rLm1q5wfw…
Waste in diagnostic trials: #ExeterTestClub Tues 4th April 4pm 1.23SC https://t.co/gQdXygmDlr https://t.co/8rLm1q5wfw @FerranteLavinia et al https://t.co/zmfijdPyPm
RT @ExeterTestGroup: Research waste in diagnostic trials https://t.co/frM8QX7y9R #ExeterTestClub next Tues 4th April 4pm 1.23 @ExeterMed ht…
RT @ExeterTestGroup: Research waste in diagnostic trials https://t.co/frM8QX7y9R #ExeterTestClub next Tues 4th April 4pm 1.23 @ExeterMed ht…
RT @ExeterTestGroup: Research waste in diagnostic trials https://t.co/frM8QX7y9R #ExeterTestClub next Tues 4th April 4pm 1.23 @ExeterMed ht…
Research waste in diagnostic trials https://t.co/frM8QX7y9R #ExeterTestClub next Tues 4th April 4pm 1.23 @ExeterMed https://t.co/EFwqbKRDjK https://t.co/APwDdicfY3
RT @ExeterTestGroup: Test-treatment RCTs & research waste: https://t.co/0RRUKTw2JG #ExeterTestClub on Tues 4th April 1.23 South Cloisters @…
RT @ExeterTestGroup: Test-treatment RCTs & research waste: https://t.co/0RRUKTw2JG #ExeterTestClub on Tues 4th April 1.23 South Cloisters @…
Test-treatment RCTs & research waste: https://t.co/0RRUKTw2JG #ExeterTestClub on Tues 4th April 1.23 South Cloisters @ExeterMed All welcome! https://t.co/9MrCB105ei
RT @CebmOxford: Research waste in diagnostic trials via @MedicalEvidence https://t.co/twyz7qcCpp #EvidenceLive https://t.co/eNPhF8hD9y
RT @paulsutcliffewe: Research waste in diagnostic trials: methods review @EvidSynthTeam @deeksj @hildabast @Richard_D_Riley @OfficialNIHR h…
#ebvm #ebm going forwards..... https://t.co/5pP92EMktV
RT @EvidenceLive: Research waste in diagnostic trials via @MedicalEvidence https://t.co/J2vTBD2i8z #EvidenceLive https://t.co/hoIDuvQHZD
Research waste in diagnostic trials via @MedicalEvidence https://t.co/J2vTBD2i8z #EvidenceLive https://t.co/hoIDuvQHZD
A great study addressing the problems in RCTs on diagnostic tests. https://t.co/RozX5Owgio
RT @EQUATORNetwork: Unless your paper includes every detail needed to understand, use&replicate your work, you waste funding&participant ef…
RT @FerranteLavinia: Most RCTs of diagnostic tests fail to fully describe test-treat interventions - evidence of yet more #researchwaste ht…
Most RCTs of diagnostic tests fail to fully describe test-treat interventions - evidence of yet more #researchwaste https://t.co/8C5uoyGZf4
We found only 5 of 103 RCTs of medical tests fully described the test-treat intervention - what a waste of research! https://t.co/2JG0nZFmuH
RT @EQUATORNetwork: Unless your paper includes every detail needed to understand, use&replicate your work, you waste funding&participant ef…
RT @CebmOxford: Research waste in diagnostic trials via @MedicalEvidence https://t.co/twyz7qcCpp #EvidenceLive https://t.co/eNPhF8hD9y
RT @CebmOxford: Research waste in diagnostic trials via @MedicalEvidence https://t.co/twyz7qcCpp #EvidenceLive https://t.co/eNPhF8hD9y
RT @EQUATORNetwork: Unless your paper includes every detail needed to understand, use&replicate your work, you waste funding&participant ef…
RT @EQUATORNetwork: Unless your paper includes every detail needed to understand, use&replicate your work, you waste funding&participant ef…
RT @EQUATORNetwork: Unless your paper includes every detail needed to understand, use&replicate your work, you waste funding&participant ef…
RT @EQUATORNetwork: Unless your paper includes every detail needed to understand, use&replicate your work, you waste funding&participant ef…
RT @CebmOxford: Research waste in diagnostic trials via @MedicalEvidence https://t.co/twyz7qcCpp #EvidenceLive https://t.co/eNPhF8hD9y
Research waste in diagnostic trials via @MedicalEvidence https://t.co/twyz7qcCpp #EvidenceLive https://t.co/eNPhF8hD9y
There is no point doing RCTs of test-treatment packages unless the intervention is clearly described so that it can be replicated. https://t.co/QvNqQRmbQF
RT @EQUATORNetwork: Unless your paper includes every detail needed to understand, use&replicate your work, you waste funding&participant ef…
RT @EQUATORNetwork: Unless your paper includes every detail needed to understand, use&replicate your work, you waste funding&participant ef…
RT @EQUATORNetwork: Unless your paper includes every detail needed to understand, use&replicate your work, you waste funding&participant ef…
RT @gerdantes: Research waste in diagnostic trials: a methods review evaluating the reporting of test-treatment interventions https://t.c…
RT @gerdantes: Research waste in diagnostic trials: a methods review evaluating the reporting of test-treatment interventions https://t.c…
RT @paulsutcliffewe: Research waste in diagnostic trials: methods review @EvidSynthTeam @deeksj @hildabast @Richard_D_Riley @OfficialNIHR h…
RT @paulsutcliffewe: Research waste in diagnostic trials: methods review @EvidSynthTeam @deeksj @hildabast @Richard_D_Riley @OfficialNIHR h…
Research waste in diagnostic trials: methods review @EvidSynthTeam @deeksj @hildabast @Richard_D_Riley @OfficialNIHR https://t.co/gjPUO5b6Gx
Les tests diagnostics sont globalement mal évalués. Leur utilisatn en clinq pose pb. https://t.co/azWCaMqaLD
RT @gerdantes: Research waste in diagnostic trials: a methods review evaluating the reporting of test-treatment interventions https://t.c…
RT @hildabast: Oh for pity's sake. Only 36% of test-treat trials of diagnostic tests describe the test - & that's the *good* news! https://…
RT @hildabast: Oh for pity's sake. Only 36% of test-treat trials of diagnostic tests describe the test - & that's the *good* news! https://…
RT @hildabast: Oh for pity's sake. Only 36% of test-treat trials of diagnostic tests describe the test - & that's the *good* news! https://…
RT @hildabast: Oh for pity's sake. Only 36% of test-treat trials of diagnostic tests describe the test - & that's the *good* news! https://…
RT @gerdantes: Research waste in diagnostic trials: a methods review evaluating the reporting of test-treatment interventions https://t.c…
RT @EQUATORNetwork: Unless your paper includes every detail needed to understand, use&replicate your work, you waste funding&participant ef…
RT @gerdantes: Research waste in diagnostic trials: a methods review evaluating the reporting of test-treatment interventions https://t.c…
Research waste in diagnostic trials: a methods review evaluating the reporting of test-treatment interventions https://t.co/LPDo6EzI06
RT @hildabast: Oh for pity's sake. Only 36% of test-treat trials of diagnostic tests describe the test - & that's the *good* news! https://…
RT @hildabast: Oh for pity's sake. Only 36% of test-treat trials of diagnostic tests describe the test - & that's the *good* news! https://…
RT @hildabast: Oh for pity's sake. Only 36% of test-treat trials of diagnostic tests describe the test - & that's the *good* news! https://…
RT @EQUATORNetwork: Unless your paper includes every detail needed to understand, use&replicate your work, you waste funding&participant ef…
RT @EQUATORNetwork: Unless your paper includes every detail needed to understand, use&replicate your work, you waste funding&participant ef…
RT @EQUATORNetwork: Unless your paper includes every detail needed to understand, use&replicate your work, you waste funding&participant ef…
RT @EQUATORNetwork: Unless your paper includes every detail needed to understand, use&replicate your work, you waste funding&participant ef…
La calidad de los estudios para determinar la utilidad de test diagnósticos para decidir tratamiento es pobre https://t.co/BUZ9UbGu8t
RT @hildabast: Oh for pity's sake. Only 36% of test-treat trials of diagnostic tests describe the test - & that's the *good* news! https://…
RT @hildabast: Oh for pity's sake. Only 36% of test-treat trials of diagnostic tests describe the test - & that's the *good* news! https://…
RT @EQUATORNetwork: Unless your paper includes every detail needed to understand, use&replicate your work, you waste funding&participant ef…
RT @hildabast: Oh for pity's sake. Only 36% of test-treat trials of diagnostic tests describe the test - & that's the *good* news! https://…
RT @hildabast: Oh for pity's sake. Only 36% of test-treat trials of diagnostic tests describe the test - & that's the *good* news! https://…
RT @EQUATORNetwork: Unless your paper includes every detail needed to understand, use&replicate your work, you waste funding&participant ef…
Unless your paper includes every detail needed to understand, use&replicate your work, you waste funding&participant efforts. #researchwaste https://t.co/1p85dcLnH2
RT @hildabast: Oh for pity's sake. Only 36% of test-treat trials of diagnostic tests describe the test - & that's the *good* news! https://…
RT @hildabast: Oh for pity's sake. Only 36% of test-treat trials of diagnostic tests describe the test - & that's the *good* news! https://…
RT @hildabast: Oh for pity's sake. Only 36% of test-treat trials of diagnostic tests describe the test - & that's the *good* news! https://…
RT @hildabast: Oh for pity's sake. Only 36% of test-treat trials of diagnostic tests describe the test - & that's the *good* news! https://…
RT @hildabast: Oh for pity's sake. Only 36% of test-treat trials of diagnostic tests describe the test - & that's the *good* news! https://…
RT @hildabast: Oh for pity's sake. Only 36% of test-treat trials of diagnostic tests describe the test - & that's the *good* news! https://…
RT @hildabast: Oh for pity's sake. Only 36% of test-treat trials of diagnostic tests describe the test - & that's the *good* news! https://…
Oh for pity's sake. Only 36% of test-treat trials of diagnostic tests describe the test - & that's the *good* news! https://t.co/azV2EXzPZi