↓ Skip to main content

Register-based data of psychosocial working conditions and occupational groups as predictors of disability pension due to musculoskeletal diagnoses: a prospective cohort study of 24 543 Swedish twins

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Register-based data of psychosocial working conditions and occupational groups as predictors of disability pension due to musculoskeletal diagnoses: a prospective cohort study of 24 543 Swedish twins
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-268
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annina Ropponen, Åsa Samuelsson, Kristina Alexanderson, Pia Svedberg

Abstract

Occupations and psychosocial working conditions have rarely been investigated as predictors of disability pension in population-based samples. This study investigated how occupational groups and psychosocial working conditions are associated with future disability pension due to musculoskeletal diagnoses, accounting for familial factors in the associations.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 37 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 17%
Researcher 5 12%
Other 3 7%
Other 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 46%
Psychology 8 20%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Engineering 3 7%
Other 5 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2013.
All research outputs
#2,231,321
of 5,034,930 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#781
of 1,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,137
of 93,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#29
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,034,930 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 54th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,695 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.